Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 295
Replies: 24   Last Post: Jun 30, 2013 3:32 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 7,025
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 295
Posted: Jun 30, 2013 3:32 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <7f88e0cf-c56f-4d82-b3eb-f85eebcf08a2@googlegroups.com>,
FredJeffries <FredJeffries@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/30/2013 1:55 AM, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:>
> > Just the contrary. Cantor knew that natural numbers exist. To know
> > that, one does not need axioms unless being a jerk, Bourbakist,
> > or matheologian, or a cross-breed of these species.

>
> One does not use axioms to prove that things exist. One writes down and
> clearly communicates axioms in order to clarify proofs and arguments,
> to expose previously unexpressed presuppositions in order to find
> possible flaws and in order to have civilized conversations.


Every mathematician makes assumptions. The good ones make clear, both
to themselves and others, what assumptions they are making.

Even as marginal a mathematician as WM makes assumptions, things he
holds to be true without having any explicit proofs of their truth,
though collectively they are often mutually contradictory.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.