Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Kevin
Posts:
81
Registered:
4/9/12


Re: John Nash, Game Theory, and Government
Posted:
Jul 2, 2013 1:51 PM


On Sunday, June 30, 2013 2:38:37 PM UTC5, Peter Percival wrote: > Kevin Barry wrote: > > > On Sunday, June 30, 2013 1:31:11 PM UTC5, Peter Percival wrote: > > >> Kevin Barry wrote: > > >> > > >>> So John Nash produced game theory and government says to itself, 'How wonderful to have something that we can bottle up and spin
Oh, right... sorry, I've mixed metaphors purposely before so I'm a little distracted by your statement... Well, a less mixed up metaphor is 'Religion is the opiate of the people.' Government wants game theory to create an opiate that will put us all into an oblivious automated stupor given Nash's grand design on humanity. Is Nash the object of my contempt? Ya see, it isn't ever Nash's fault. Academe knows Nash has to be Nash and academe knows that Nash's plan for humanity isn't going to happen or work but try convincing government.
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Something of a mixed metaphor there. > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure I understand your meaning... Nash's brain is an analog computer. Matching my brain with his means I can reach no conclusion except that Nash on my team is a standard regression given the prospect of a linear progression. (other... An egg is a first approximation to an ellipse.) > > > > Perhaps I should have deleted more. Would this have been clearer: > > > > >>> How wonderful to have something that we can bottle up and spin > > >> > > >> Something of a mixed metaphor there. > > > > ? > > > >  > > I think I am an Elephant, > > Behind another Elephant > > Behind /another/ Elephant who isn't really there.... > > A.A. Milne



