The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 5, 2013 2:13 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Friday, 5 July 2013 05:46:32 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
> >
> Would you believe that WM claims 100% of those dependent on WM's grading for
> passing WM's courses say one thing but 100% of those not taking any of WM's
> courses, and thus not under his thumb, say the reverse.
> Why should anybody join you in the matheological claim that a sequence 0, 0,
> 0, ... has limit oo ???

That sequence doesn not have that limits anywhere outside of WM's wild
weird world of WMytheology .

> I don't know anybody to do so, except people who
> spent their whole or at least half lives doing "logic in the field of set
> theory".

Any such "people" exist only in WM's imagination, a place where nothing
real ever happens.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.