Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 9,012
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 6, 2013 4:22 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <ab67c973-f58d-41ee-ae0d-512b0d6a4bb7@googlegroups.com>,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> On Friday, 5 July 2013 20:13:08 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
>

> >> Why should anybody join you in the matheological claim that a sequence 0,
> >> 0, 0, ... has limit oo ???

>
> > That sequence doesn not have that limits anywhere
>
> That is true - except in matheology where the sequence 1/Card(|N\FIS(n)) is 0
> for every n but has limit oo.


NO! That 'sequence' is only defined in WM's wild weird world of
WMytheology, so has no limit anywhere else.

And outside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology, a sequence of all
zeroes would always have limit zero, because:

Outside the wild weird world of WMytheology, every neighborhood of the
limit of a real sequence must contain all but finitely many members of
that sequence.

A mathematician would have known that, but WM clearly does not, so is
clearly not a mathematician.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.