Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 15,323
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 7, 2013 7:49 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sunday, 7 July 2013 13:34:47 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> "Michael Klemm" <m_f_klemm@t-online.de> wrote in message news:krb4m5$ftr$1@solani.org... > WM wrote: > >> ... except in matheology where the sequence 1/Card(|N\FIS(n)) is 0 for >> every n but has limit oo. > > No. lim_{n-->oo} 1/Card(|N\FIS(n)) = lim_{n-->oo} 1/oo = lim_{n-->oo} 0 > = 0. Pardon the basic question, but I do not understand your result. Isn't: lim_{n->oo} 1/Card(N\Fison(n)) = = 1/Card(N\(lim_{n->oo} Fison(n))) = = 1/Card(N\N)= = 1/Card({}) = = 1/0 = oo What am I doing wrong? Julio

You use set theory where analysis is required.

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.