Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
LudovicoVan

Posts: 3,201
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 7, 2013 8:13 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

<mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
news:8de5731f-8a55-4e64-ab91-32e35be974f7@googlegroups.com...
> On Sunday, 7 July 2013 13:34:47 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> "Michael Klemm" <m_f_klemm@t-online.de> wrote in message
>> news:krb4m5$ftr$1@solani.org...

>>> WM wrote:
>
>>>> ... except in matheology where the sequence 1/Card(|N\FIS(n)) is 0 for
>>>> every n but has limit oo.

>>>
>>> No. lim_{n-->oo} 1/Card(|N\FIS(n)) = lim_{n-->oo} 1/oo = lim_{n-->oo} 0
>>>

>> = 0. Pardon the basic question, but I do not understand your result.
>> Isn't:
>>
>> lim_{n->oo} 1/Card(N\Fison(n)) =
>> = 1/Card(N\(lim_{n->oo} Fison(n))) =
>> = 1/Card(N\N)=
>> = 1/Card({}) =
>> = 1/0
>> = oo
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?

>
> You use set theory where analysis is required.


Could you be more specific?

Julio





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.