The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Klemm

Posts: 133
Registered: 11/13/12
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 7, 2013 11:21 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Julio Di Egidio wrote:

>>>> lim_{n->oo} 1/Card(N\Fison(n)) =
= 1/Card(N\(lim_{n->oo} Fison(n))) =
= 1/Card(N\N)=
= 1/Card({}) =
= 1/0
= oo
>>>> What am I doing wrong?

>>> The first lim_{n->oo} refers to a sequence of naturals
> But that is not a sequence of naturals:

The expression
lim_{n->oo} 1/Card(N\Fison(n))
Limes of the sequence
(1/Card(N\Fison(1)), 1/Card(N\Fison(2)),1/Card(N\Fison(3)),....)
= (0,0,0,....),
the value n = oo excluded.
This limes is 0.

The expression
Card(N\(lim_{n->oo} Fison(n)))
Limes of the sequence
{oo} not contained in the sequence and
oo not contained in any of its members.
This limit is by definition the set of all
naturals contained in infinitively many members
of the sequence. Thus, the limit is the empty set {}.
Hence one obtains
1/Card(N\lim_{n->oo} Fison(n)) = oo.

Therefore the error in the calculation is the first equation
lim_{n->oo} 1/Card(N\Fison(n)) =
= 1/Card(N\(lim_{n->oo} Fison(n))).


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.