Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:53 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 LudovicoVan Posts: 4,165 From: London Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 7, 2013 3:57 PM

"Zeit Geist" <tucsondrew@me.com> wrote in message
> On Sunday, July 7, 2013 11:26:34 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> "Zeit Geist" <tucsondrew@me.com> wrote in message

>> > On Sunday, July 7, 2013 2:59:23 AM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de
>> > wrote:

>>
>> >> The old story of the marbles in the urn. In the limit the urn is empty
>> >> but the limit of number of marbles is infinite. If limits have to be
>> >> calculated by the finite terms, like in mathematics,then this is a

>>
>> > You mean the Urn where every marble is eventually removed,
>> > and at Noon the Urn is empty?

>>
>> That's indeed a patent logical invalidity, already enough to warrant a
>> revision of standard set theory.

>
> At t = 0, add marbles labeled 1 and 2.
> At t = 1/2, remove 1, and add 3 and 4.
> At t = 3/4 = 1 - 1/4, remove 2 and add 5 and 6
>
> In general;
> At t = ( 1 - 1/( 2 ^ n ) )remove marble n,
> and add marbles 2n + 1 and 2n + 2.
>
> You can, easily, use those equations to
> find times, t_a and t_r, when any marble is

Indeed, as well as use them to calculate a limit.

> Now, this entire things seems logically invalid,
> And IS paradoxical. However, the logic is fine.

You are an idiot: it's the conclusion that I am questioning, not the
definitions.

> If you answer "Yes" to those three questions,
> then "At t = 1, the Urn is Empty." Is Logically Valid.

Of course I would not answer yes to those questions: the rule is 2 in for
each 1 out, so you cannot end up empty by any logic that is a logic.

> If you don't believe that we can Mathematically divide
> an interval in half infinitely many time, or have All Natural
> because everything he says follows from that.

WM does not use logic, but you do not appear very much to the point either.

Julio

Date Subject Author
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/7/13 Virgil
7/7/13 Virgil
7/7/13 Virgil
7/8/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/8/13 Virgil
7/8/13 Virgil
7/8/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/8/13 Virgil
7/8/13 Tanu R.
7/9/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/9/13 Virgil
7/8/13 Virgil
7/8/13 Virgil