Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 7, 2013 4:16 PM

mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> On Sunday, 7 July 2013 13:34:47 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> > "Michael Klemm" <m_f_klemm@t-online.de> wrote in message
> > news:krb4m5\$ftr\$1@solani.org... > WM wrote: > >> ... except in matheology
> > where the sequence 1/Card(|N\FIS(n)) is 0 for >> every n but has limit oo.

> > > > No. lim_{n-->oo} 1/Card(|N\FIS(n)) = lim_{n-->oo} 1/oo = lim_{n-->oo} 0
> > > = 0. Pardon the basic question, but I do not understand your result.
> > Isn't: lim_{n->oo} 1/Card(N\Fison(n)) = = 1/Card(N\(lim_{n->oo} Fison(n)))
> > = = 1/Card(N\N)= = 1/Card({}) = = 1/0 = oo What am I doing wrong? Julio

>
> You use set theory where analysis is required.

When one has the set expression |N\Fison(n), in which both "|N" and
"FIS(n)" represent sets and "\" represents a set operation, only a fool
like WM will object to the use of set theory in evaluating what cannot
be evaluated without it.
--

Date Subject Author
7/5/13 Virgil
7/6/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/6/13 Virgil
7/7/13 Michael Klemm
7/7/13 Virgil
7/7/13 Michael Klemm
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/7/13 Virgil
7/7/13 Virgil
7/7/13 Michael Klemm
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 Michael Klemm
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/7/13 Michael Klemm
7/7/13 LudovicoVan
7/8/13 Michael Klemm
7/7/13 Virgil
7/8/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/8/13 Virgil
7/8/13 Virgil
7/9/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/9/13 Virgil