The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 7, 2013 4:24 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Sunday, 7 July 2013 14:13:22 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

> > > You use set theory where analysis is required. Could you be more
> > > specific?

> Please look at the sheets that I prepared for my students, here:

So not look at the shits by which WM deludes his students, when everyone
but WM can easily see that
For all n in |N, F(m) = n + m bijects |N with |N\FIS(n)
so that
Theorem: for all n in |N, Card(|N) = Card(|N\FIS(n))

So WM is still/again proven wrong!!!

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.