Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:53 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Tucsondrew@me.com

Posts: 806
Registered: 5/24/13
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 7, 2013 5:45 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sunday, July 7, 2013 2:25:56 PM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> "Zeit Geist" <tucsondrew@me.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9a578968-f024-4501-a54d-1d6e7f82f0e1@googlegroups.com...
>
>
>

> > I only need for each n, there is a time t_n < 1 such that
>
> > marble n I s removed at time t_n; in order to prove
>
> > the vase is empty at time t.
>
>
>
> That conclusion is patently illogical: at that very time t_n, 2 more marbles
>
> get in. You rather have proven that you don't know what logic is, and what
>
> a proof is.
>


Okay, WM Junior, you are saying the infinite should be just
like the finite.
You and WM are the idiots for thinking so.

In the Calculus, lim_{x-->oo}( 2x ) = lim_{x-->oo}( 1x ) = oo.

How Illogical!!!

> Julio

ZG



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.