On Sunday, July 7, 2013 3:59:33 PM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > "Zeit Geist" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message > > news:email@example.com... > > > > >> "That conclusion is patently illogical: at that very time t_n, > > >> 2 more marbles get in." Julio > > > > > > Which is treating the infinite just as the finite. > > > > Bollocks, you just cannot read, and I'll leave you at that. >
I read at any finite, twice as many are put in than removed; hence, at any finite step it is NOT empty. Therefore, it is NOT empty after aleph_0 steps. And, that is invalid deduction!
If that is not what that sentence means to you, please let me know how you interpret it.