The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 8, 2013 12:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sunday, 7 July 2013 22:11:41 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:

> You are assuming, wrongly, that one must have for any functions f and g that f(lim_{n->oo} g(n) ) = lim_{n->oo} f(g(n))

But he is assuming correctly that limit(card(urn)) = oo is contradictory to an empty urn, i.e., card(limit(urn)) = 0.

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.