Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 17   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 8:54 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
LudovicoVan

Posts: 3,201
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 9, 2013 10:10 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

<mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
news:ede4944c-947e-4b04-b2b0-18a165c80066@googlegroups.com...
> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 13:54:03 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>

>> I have posted about the Ross-Littlewood paradox and
>> resolutions in the past: scattered in the noise, but I could
>> try and dig out something if you or anybody is really
>> interested.

>
> Not necessary. Here is a solid piece:


Here is a solid piece of your junk, that is.

> I think I can contribute an idea that saves you at least one bill.
> For that sake simply require that you never hand a bill to the
> devil unless you are in possession of at least another bill. This
> condition, laid down by an additional clause in the contract,
> must never be violated and remains valid in eternity.


You cannot impose conditions upon the devil's contract. Out of metaphor,
yours is not a valid solution, and the additional constraint is unneeded
anyway.

Now keep playing deaf, dumb and blind.

Julio





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.