Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 20   Last Post: Jul 11, 2013 3:47 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Tucsondrew@me.com Posts: 1,161 Registered: 5/24/13
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 9, 2013 4:47 PM

On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 1:25:55 PM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> "Zeit Geist" <tucsondrew@me.com> wrote in message
>
>
>
>

> > As long as, we go no further than omega, we can talk about
>
> > either Ordinals or Cardinals and get the same answer.
>
>
>
> That the answer is the same is rather my thesis. Read my last post if you
>
> can stand it, I am done for today with the liars and the mentally impaired.
>

I read it. Very angry sounding.
Did some step on your dick or something?

You wrote:
"Wrong: every one is removed but never all."

That is just something WM Junior would say.

And I know you are mentally impaired, but think of it this way.
After a marble is added, the are infinitely many steps
remaining for which the marble might be removed.
It doesn't matter if its 20 steps up or 20^20^20^20^20^20
steps up. The step for that marble to be removed exists
in the interval t = [0,1].

But you say, the function, f(m) = number of marbles in urn at step m,
is increasing, so how can it be 0 at t = 1?

The function behaves differently at omega, maybe?

The study of Mathematics is about finding where Analogies
breakdown. This happens a lot at the Limit Ordinal Omega.

> Julio

ZG

Date Subject Author
7/9/13 LudovicoVan
7/9/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/9/13 Virgil
7/9/13 fom
7/10/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/10/13 fom
7/10/13 Virgil
7/9/13 Virgil
7/10/13 Virgil
7/10/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/10/13 Virgil
7/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/11/13 Virgil
7/11/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
7/11/13 Virgil
7/11/13 Virgil