The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 20   Last Post: Jul 11, 2013 3:47 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 9, 2013 5:56 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 22:47:23 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
> > The function behaves differently at omega, maybe? The study of Mathematics
> > is about finding where Analogies breakdown. This happens a lot at the
> > Limit Ordinal Omega.

> For instance it happens in the Cantor list. Here we have as many lines as we
> have steps in the urn. If there something unexpected can happen "at omega",
> it can also happen in the Cantor list "at omega". But the list has no line
> omega? Why do you think then that the urn has a step omega?

WM, as usual, misses the point that any mark that indicating that an
infinite process is completed is not a part of the process.

The time of noon is not a part of the infinite process of moving balls
into and out of the vase but is a mark that that process has ended, and
that every natural that has a successor has been both inserted into and
then removed from the vase.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.