|
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted:
Jul 10, 2013 4:26 PM
|
|
On Wednesday, 10 July 2013 19:46:26 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
> that clause is just another of WM's unproven and unprovable claims.
It is nothing to be proven. 1) This clause is my choice, my premise. Your attempts to deny it show that you have recognized its power and prove this power. What you fail to recognize is, unfortunately,that 2) this clause could not even be circumvented if you and |N and all matheologians prayed for it.
Regards, WM
|
|