Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 20   Last Post: Jul 11, 2013 3:47 PM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 13,446
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 10, 2013 4:26 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Wednesday, 10 July 2013 19:46:26 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:

> that clause is just another of WM's unproven and unprovable claims.

It is nothing to be proven.
1) This clause is my choice, my premise.
Your attempts to deny it show that you have recognized its power and prove this power.
What you fail to recognize is, unfortunately,that
2) this clause could not even be circumvented if you and |N and all matheologians prayed for it.

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.