The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 20   Last Post: Jul 11, 2013 3:47 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 10, 2013 6:58 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Wednesday, 10 July 2013 19:46:26 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:

> > that clause is just another of WM's unproven and unprovable claims.
> It is nothing to be proven.
> 1) This clause is my choice, my premise.

If it is no more than one of WM's premises,
no one else can be required to accept it.

> Your attempts to deny it show that you have recognized its power and prove
> this power.

WE merely reject it
> What you fail to recognize is, unfortunately,that
> 2) this clause could not even be circumvented

If it is a premise, anyone can circumvent it merely by ignoring it.

Any mere premise (assumption, postulate, presumption, supposition)
can be rejected by anyone at any time for any or even no reason.

And mathematicians summarily reject most of WM's premises.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.