Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Matheology � 300
Posted:
Jul 11, 2013 2:44 AM


In article <ec20ee900247428bb2055a193f53415d@googlegroups.com>, mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 July 2013 00:58:56 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > > Any mere premise (assumption, postulate, presumption, supposition) can be > > rejected by anyone at any time for any or even no reason. > > Nevertheless one can wonder what would happen in case the premise is > accepted?
How about the premise that there is a set with a first element and for each element a successor element and which is a subset of any other set with those properties?
Or a set of sets which contains {}, and for each of its members, m, also contains m\/{m} and is minimal with respect to those properties?
They are premises that are far more widely accepted than any of the ones corrupting WM's wild weird world of WMytheology. 

