Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jul 12, 2013 4:27 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Virgil

Posts: 9,012
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 12, 2013 4:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <92a3ccf9-5b09-4a59-aa53-a1919e3421e2@googlegroups.com>,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> On Friday, 12 July 2013 01:35:10 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
>

> > > Doing mathematics is deriving theorems from premises - not changing the
> > > premises in case the results are disliked.

>
> > You changed the premises or added some by putting your statement in.
>
> No. My premise, never to give the last number to the devil, is not added but
> is immanent in the naturals.


But standard calculus, for example, is totally compatible with the
direct negation of WM's premises about the nature of the naturals, and
incompatible with their assumption.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.