The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: WMytheology � 300
Replies: 3   Last Post: Jul 13, 2013 9:05 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 13, 2013 9:05 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 7/12/2013 3:41 PM, wrote:
> If you do not talk about the set, then there is no reason to talk about alephs.

Now what had been one of David Petry's justification
for the verificationist view?

Scientific inquiry is a natural phenomenon to be
compared with how children learn about the world.


As I have said before, "science" is about being
told what to believe more than it is is about
discerning anything close to truth.

Date Subject Author
Read Re: WMytheology � 300
Read Re: Matheology § 300

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.