Virgil
Posts:
9,012
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Matheology � 300
Posted:
Jul 16, 2013 4:06 AM


In article <eff0ec72155c4e7488d95ac5fa5acec0@googlegroups.com>, mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 02:03:55 UTC+2, fom wrote: > > On 7/15/2013 4:09 PM, mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote: > > > This is only an argument to use the correct term  transfinite. Now you > > will point out Cantor's metaphysical beliefs to justify your agenda... ... > > and so it goes ... ... and so it goes ... ... and so it goes ... ... and so > > it goes ... ... and so it goes ... ... > > No. Simply try to discern what makes N larger than every FIS. Every FIS is > finite. What turns a potentially set of "every FIS" into the actually > infinite set of "all n or all FIS".
Among other things, that there is no finite limit to the number of FISONs, or of naturals. > > It's the deal with the devil. But that is only facilitated by people who are > too stupid, far too stupid to keep at least one $ by never paying the last $. > I am not as stupid. I will always keep the last $. And the natural numbers > are not as stupid too.
Only in WM's wild weird world of WMytheology, is there the delusion of a last natura even though there is usually a last Euro. > >  at least after I have told you.
Anyone who is stupid enough to believe in something merely beccause WM claims it, deserves to be fooled by him. 

