
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted:
Jul 20, 2013 5:54 AM


On Saturday, 20 July 2013 00:30:19 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
>> If you define the Binary Tree that contains only all finite initial segments of its infinite paths
> Unless those infinite paths all actually existed, it would be nonsense to speak of finite initial segments of them.
Even if they don't exist, matheologians know what I mean with their FIS. Since I speak to matheologians, this is fine.
So answer: How can we distinguish this Binary Tree that contains only all FIS of the paths of his big brother from his big brother?
Regards, WM

