Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Matheology � 300
Replies:
14
Last Post:
Jul 23, 2013 1:31 AM



Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Matheology � 300
Posted:
Jul 20, 2013 3:31 PM


In article <6a3eb6d79b3e4d54ae1f7b164fec8141@googlegroups.com>, mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote:
> On Saturday, 20 July 2013 00:30:19 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > > > Why do you believe in such paths? > > > Because the tree, being defined, exists, and it cannot exist without all > > those paths. > > No? Why can the list of rationals exist without all irrational reals?
Because the rationals are provably countable. Any countable set can be listed without inclusion of any nonmembers. At least outside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology.
> least the undefinable reals should be present, because nobody can find them.
Now WM want to force inclusion of that which he cannot find and does not, in his heart of hearts, believe exists. > Otherwise we would have an effect of how we write. Writing with nodes like > the Incas would differ from writing like we are used to do.
The Incas did not "write with nodes" but they did use the quipu in which knots and cords had some sort of mnemonic significance not now understood. . 



