The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 14   Last Post: Jul 23, 2013 1:31 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 20, 2013 3:31 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Saturday, 20 July 2013 00:30:19 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
> > > Why do you believe in such paths?
> > Because the tree, being defined, exists, and it cannot exist without all
> > those paths.

> No? Why can the list of rationals exist without all irrational reals?

Because the rationals are provably countable.
Any countable set can be listed without inclusion of any non-members.
At least outside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology.

> least the undefinable reals should be present, because nobody can find them.

Now WM want to force inclusion of that which he cannot find and does
not, in his heart of hearts, believe exists.

> Otherwise we would have an effect of how we write. Writing with nodes like
> the Incas would differ from writing like we are used to do.

The Incas did not "write with nodes" but they did use the quipu in which
knots and cords had some sort of mnemonic significance not now
understood. .

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.