Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Can a fraction have none noneending and nonerepeating decimal representation?
Replies: 108   Last Post: Aug 16, 2013 5:22 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 JT Posts: 1,448 Registered: 4/7/12
Re: Can a fraction have none noneending and nonerepeating decimal representation?
Posted: Jul 31, 2013 4:41 PM

Den onsdagen den 31:e juli 2013 kl. 22:22:28 UTC+2 skrev Virgil:
>
> jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>

> > Den tisdagen den 30:e juli 2013 kl. 21:39:04 UTC+2 skrev Virgil:
>
> > > In article <3ef71a1a-0168-4f56-bc9e-f4af3d5f9fe0@googlegroups.com>,
>
> > >
>
> > > jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > Den tisdagen den 30:e juli 2013 kl. 17:12:38 UTC+2 skrev
>
> > >
>
> > > > jonas.t...@gmail.com:
>
> > >
>
> > > > > Can a fraction have none noneending and nonerepeating decimal
>
> > >
>
> > > > > representation?
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > I was thinking that is seem that the choice of base to represent
>
> > > > fractions,
>
> > >
>
> > > > can lead to nonending repetive patterns, but can they also be none
>
> > > > repetive?
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > In any natural number base, not only base ten decimals, rationals are
>
> > >
>
> > > either terminating or repeating (all rationals are repeating if one
>
> > >
>
> > > includes eventually repeating only zeroes) and all irrationals are
>
> > >
>
> > > non-repeating.
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > I guess not, but a rounding error calculating Pi could easily transform a
>
> > >
>
> > > > perfectly rational fraction to irrational, isn't that true?
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > A *SLIGHT* flaw in the arithmetic
>
> > >
>
> > > --
>
> >
>
> > Well what i said was that a slight error doing arithmetics could prevent Pi
>
> > from becoming rational.
>
>
>
> A rounding error in calculating pi is much more likely to make pi seem
>
> rational, since in calculating pi without error it is not.
>
> --

Or your arithmetic is not upto it, who knows

Date Subject Author
7/30/13 JT
7/30/13 JT
7/30/13 Virgil
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Virgil
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Virgil
7/31/13 Virgil
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 LudovicoVan
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 LudovicoVan
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Virgil
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 Virgil
8/3/13 grei
7/31/13 JT
8/4/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
8/4/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
7/31/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
7/31/13 Virgil
8/1/13 magidin@math.berkeley.edu
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Peter Percival
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Peter Percival
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Peter Percival
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 magidin@math.berkeley.edu
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 Peter Percival
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 JT
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 Virgil
8/1/13 magidin@math.berkeley.edu
8/1/13 Richard Tobin
8/2/13 David Bernier
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Richard Tobin
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Peter Percival
8/2/13 Richard Tobin
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Peter Percival
8/2/13 Richard Tobin
8/16/13 Earle Jones
8/2/13 Virgil
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 RGVickson@shaw.ca
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Virgil
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Virgil
8/2/13 Virgil
8/2/13 Virgil
8/2/13 David Bernier
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Virgil
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Virgil
8/3/13 David Bernier
8/3/13 David Bernier
8/4/13 David Bernier
8/2/13 quasi
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Virgil
8/2/13 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
8/2/13 JT
8/2/13 Virgil
8/2/13 FredJeffries@gmail.com
8/16/13 Earle Jones
7/31/13 JT
7/31/13 Phil H
7/31/13 JT
7/30/13 Earle Jones