
Re: A finite set of all naturals
Posted:
Aug 12, 2013 11:59 PM


On 12/08/2013 9:51 PM, Wisely NonTheist wrote: > In article <UHhOt.266168$Ln4.151439@fx24.iad>, > Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@shaw.ca> wrote: > >> And of course arithmetically, induction, from a binary operation point >> of view, would not be possible without addition, designated as '+'. > > Induction depends on successorship and can quite easily be done without > even defining addition.
What do you think what the term "arithmetically" would entail?
Can Goldbach Conjecture be expressed without addition?
Or, did you notice my caveat "from a binary operation point of view"?
  There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.
NYOGEN SENZAKI

