The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: have to share this-one
Replies: 6   Last Post: Aug 24, 2013 5:18 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
frank zubek

Posts: 222
Registered: 5/12/09
Re: have to share this-one
Posted: Aug 23, 2013 3:26 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

GSC; wrote;
) You disapprove of Buckminster Fuller and his works;
ii) You disapprove of Kirby Urner and his works.

fz; there is no difference between Bucky and Kirby, Kirby merely propagates Bucky. Kirby have not invented, solved, nothing he just elevates Bucky they work is a mirror reflection of one and the other, so I do not understand your objection at all.

It is not that I disprove Bucky I love tetrahedrons, concentric hierarchy and all the work that stems from it, but it is ALL wrong, that's all.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.