|
Re: A finite set of all naturals
Posted:
Aug 24, 2013 1:33 AM
|
|
On 23/08/2013 11:25 PM, Peter Percival wrote: > Nam Nguyen wrote: >> On 23/08/2013 1:39 PM, Peter Percival wrote: >>> Nam Nguyen wrote: >>>> On 23/08/2013 1:05 PM, Peter Percival wrote: >>>>> Nam Nguyen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I certainly meant "odd(x) can _NOT_ be defined as a positive formula >>>>>> ...". >>>>> >>>>> Are you going to prove that? >>>> >>>> What was the context that I said that, could you remind me? >>> >>> So you're not. Just like all your other assertions. >> >> So, you're simply (or conveniently?) unable to see the 2 different >> contexts I've defined odd(x) [and even even(x)]! > > Since you keep on changing your definitions and none of them are > coherent in the first place, how can anyone understand you?
Do you speak for everyone (some of whom might be at professor level) who might read the conversations here?
-- ----------------------------------------------------- There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.
NYOGEN SENZAKI
|
|