|
|
Re: A finite set of all naturals
Posted:
Aug 24, 2013 1:33 AM
|
|
On 23/08/2013 11:25 PM, Peter Percival wrote:
> Nam Nguyen wrote:
>> On 23/08/2013 1:39 PM, Peter Percival wrote:
>>> Nam Nguyen wrote:
>>>> On 23/08/2013 1:05 PM, Peter Percival wrote:
>>>>> Nam Nguyen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I certainly meant "odd(x) can _NOT_ be defined as a positive formula
>>>>>> ...".
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you going to prove that?
>>>>
>>>> What was the context that I said that, could you remind me?
>>>
>>> So you're not. Just like all your other assertions.
>>
>> So, you're simply (or conveniently?) unable to see the 2 different
>> contexts I've defined odd(x) [and even even(x)]!
>
> Since you keep on changing your definitions and none of them are
> coherent in the first place, how can anyone understand you?
Do you speak for everyone (some of whom might be at professor level)
who might read the conversations here?
--
-----------------------------------------------------
There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.
NYOGEN SENZAKI
|
|
