
Re: A finite set of all naturals
Posted:
Aug 24, 2013 1:33 AM


On 23/08/2013 11:25 PM, Peter Percival wrote: > Nam Nguyen wrote: >> On 23/08/2013 1:39 PM, Peter Percival wrote: >>> Nam Nguyen wrote: >>>> On 23/08/2013 1:05 PM, Peter Percival wrote: >>>>> Nam Nguyen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I certainly meant "odd(x) can _NOT_ be defined as a positive formula >>>>>> ...". >>>>> >>>>> Are you going to prove that? >>>> >>>> What was the context that I said that, could you remind me? >>> >>> So you're not. Just like all your other assertions. >> >> So, you're simply (or conveniently?) unable to see the 2 different >> contexts I've defined odd(x) [and even even(x)]! > > Since you keep on changing your definitions and none of them are > coherent in the first place, how can anyone understand you?
Do you speak for everyone (some of whom might be at professor level) who might read the conversations here?
  There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.
NYOGEN SENZAKI

