Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: A finite set of all naturals
Posted:
Aug 24, 2013 1:48 AM


Nam Nguyen wrote: > On 23/08/2013 8:59 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> >> How is 2 defined in L2(*)? What are the axioms for *? Don't both use S? > > _Here_ I was merely clarifying the relativity (the language dependence) > of "positivity"/"negativity" of nonlogical formulas in general, and not > attempting to define something specific such as 2.
Is it sensible to talk about language and not specify what the language is? Note that it is even worse if you are talking about two languages. It your claim about the truth value of cGC about expressions in some particular language? If so, which language?
 Sorrow in all lands, and grievous omens. Great anger in the dragon of the hills, And silent now the earth's green oracles That will not speak again of innocence. David Sutton  Geomancies



