On 8/25/2013 2:35 AM, Nam Nguyen wrote: > On 24/08/2013 8:53 PM, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote: >> In <lxXRt.firstname.lastname@example.org>, on 08/23/2013 >> at 11:29 PM, Nam Nguyen <email@example.com> said: >> >>> If you can't answer a simple question and can't maintain the >>> civility >> >> PKB. >> >>> you do have an option to get the fuck out of the conversation. >> >> As do you. He certainly has not obligation to do so. > > I was _only responding_ to Peter's _uncalled-for personal attack_ > _and pervert language_ in technical argument which I'm quoting > here: > > "Are you a child or a mental defective? You certainly don't know > how adults behave in their intercourse with one another." > > and his comment is nothing but a piece of intellectual trash. > > Have you ever been critical of this comment of his? Have you > ever advised him not to repeat his unbecoming a serious poster? > > Why do need to, as you seem to have, defend such a piece of > intellectual garbage? >
What defense? What seems to have been pointed out is that you can choose to be civil by ignoring statements that are not on topic.
And, before you again shower me with intellectually sophisticated compliments, let me thank you in advance.