Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Nx2N lapped orthogonal transform
Replies: 13   Last Post: Sep 12, 2013 7:38 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 James Dow Allen Posts: 15 Registered: 12/14/08
Re: Nx2N lapped orthogonal transform
Posted: Sep 3, 2013 5:32 AM

James Dow Allen <gmail@jamesdowallen.nospam> might have writ, in
news:XnsA22175B33BFDDjamesdowallen@178.63.61.175:

> Let
> ( A B 0 )
> ( 0 A B )
> ( B 0 A )
> be a 3Nx3N real matrix with A,B,0 each NxN and 0 an all-zeros matrix.
>
> What is the necessary and sufficient condition for that matrix to be
> orthogonal, i.e. that its transpose also be its inverse?
>
> This problem statement can be considered ambiguous.
> *But if you derive a good parametric form for (A B) you will know it.*
>
> (I already "know the answer." I post from curiosity: Is this a VERY easy
> problem, or just an easy problem?)

James Dow Allen <gmail@jamesdowallen.nospam> might have writ, in
news:XnsA2236C8E3E26Ajamesdowallen@178.63.61.175:

> I found it fruitful to introduce M = A + B; S = A - B

I will bump my own thread one time. I'm certain that this is an easy
problem for many sci.math'ers, especially with the hint.
The solution involves a particular type of matrix which might lead to an
interesting discussion.

James Dow Allen

Date Subject Author
8/19/13 James Dow Allen
8/19/13 Nicolas Bonneel
8/20/13 Robin Chapman
8/20/13 Nicolas Bonneel
8/20/13 quasi
8/20/13 Nicolas Bonneel
8/20/13 Roland Franzius
8/20/13 James Dow Allen
9/3/13 James Dow Allen
9/3/13 Robin Chapman
9/3/13 Leon Aigret
9/5/13 James Dow Allen
9/5/13 Robin Chapman
9/12/13 Leon Aigret