The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Nx2N lapped orthogonal transform
Replies: 13   Last Post: Sep 12, 2013 7:38 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Leon Aigret

Posts: 31
Registered: 12/2/12
Re: Nx2N lapped orthogonal transform
Posted: Sep 3, 2013 6:06 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:51:42 +0100, Robin Chapman
<> wrote:

>On 03/09/2013 10:32, James Dow Allen wrote:
>> James Dow Allen <gmail@jamesdowallen.nospam> might have writ, in
>> news:XnsA22175B33BFDDjamesdowallen@

>>> Let
>>> ( A B 0 )
>>> ( 0 A B )
>>> ( B 0 A )
>>> be a 3Nx3N real matrix with A,B,0 each NxN and 0 an all-zeros matrix.
>>> What is the necessary and sufficient condition for that matrix to be
>>> orthogonal, i.e. that its transpose also be its inverse?
>>> This problem statement can be considered ambiguous.
>>> *But if you derive a good parametric form for (A B) you will know it.*
>>> (I already "know the answer." I post from curiosity: Is this a VERY easy
>>> problem, or just an easy problem?)

>> James Dow Allen <gmail@jamesdowallen.nospam> might have writ, in
>> news:XnsA2236C8E3E26Ajamesdowallen@

>>> I found it fruitful to introduce M = A + B; S = A - B
>Both orthogonal, of course. So what about MS^{-1} = MS^t?
>What can one say about that ... ?

The AB^t = 0 condition translates to the requirement that MS^t is both
its own transpose and its own inverse, with drastic consequences for
its eigenvectors and eigenvalues.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.