The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.symbolic

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The integration test suites for Sage.
Replies: 14   Last Post: Sep 14, 2013 1:53 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,245
Registered: 4/26/08
Re: The integration test suites for Sage.
Posted: Sep 5, 2013 11:35 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply schrieb:
> M> The integral numbers in the above are those used on your site. For
> M> easy reference my (current) Derive file is appended, where the
> M> numbering is Timofeev's however.
> Thanks Martin! I hope we are in sync now.

I notice some discrepancies between your Charlwood jump table and the
Maxima column of Albert's ultimate reckoning at


Your numbers 21, 23, 49 are shown as done while Albert's are not. And
your number 43 is shown as wrong whereas Albert records a success.

Thus you appear to be overestimating the performance of Sage/Maxima.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.