Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Leaving 0^0 undefined -- A number-theoretic rationale
Replies: 48   Last Post: Sep 15, 2013 1:06 PM

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Peter Percival Posts: 2,623 Registered: 10/25/10
Re: Leaving 0^0 undefined -- A number-theoretic rationale
Posted: Sep 13, 2013 4:56 AM
 Plain Text Reply

Dan Christensen wrote:

> Playing around with a calculator, I found the following:
>
> If x=0 and y is a very small positive real number, then we have
> x^y=0. Shifting x just slightly into the positive suddenly results in
> x^y being very close to 1.
>
> Nothing earth-shattering here, but it seems to reinforce my
> recommendation that 0^0 ought to be left undefined for any real-world
> applications. f(x,y)=x^y simply behaves too strangely close to the
> origin.
>
> Comments?

You've changed the question, haven't you? Didn't it start out as what
is 0^0 in the natural numbers? Now it seems you're talking about reals
(and even the real-world, shudder). For x^y in the reals you might want
to look at this picture:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:X%5Ey.png.
Note the text below it: "3D plot of z = abs(x)^y showing how different
limits are reached along different curves approaching (0,0)."

--
Sorrow in all lands, and grievous omens.
Great anger in the dragon of the hills,
And silent now the earth's green oracles
That will not speak again of innocence.
David Sutton -- Geomancies

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.