Posts:
822
Registered:
9/1/10


Re: Musatov Prime Generalization Conjecture
Posted:
Sep 13, 2013 10:16 PM


On Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:06:30 AM UTC5, Dik T. Winter wrote: > In article <115c718cfe664a34ac7c02b57c508d71@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> Musatov <marty.musatov@gmail.com> writes: > ... > When are you going to stop to post these mindless conjectures based on a > very small number of cases? Never but only by one stop.> > > Consider each case: > > > > For four: (#4) > > > > 2*4+1=9 not prime > > 2*14+1=29 prime > > 2*24+1=49 not prime > > > > In the above instances "N" ends in "4" and is not prime, the formula > > produces a number with square prime factors (i.e. 3*3=9 and 7*7=49). > > (i.e. When it does not produce a prime the composite is a prime > > squared). > > Wrong. 2*34+1 = 69 = 3*23. > 2*544+1 = 1089 = 3*3*11*11 > 2*364+1 = 729 = 3*3*3*3*3*3 > > > Also, we note: > > > > When "N" ends in "4" and the formula produces a composite number, > > adding "two" to the composite produces a prime. > > > > Shown: > > 2*4+1=9+2=11 prime > > 2*24+1=49+2=51 prime > > Since when is 51 prime? >  > dik t. winter, cwi, science park 123, 1098 xg amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131 > home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/

