Posts:
822
Registered:
9/1/10
|
|
Re: Musatov Prime Generalization Conjecture
Posted:
Sep 13, 2013 10:16 PM
|
|
On Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:06:30 AM UTC-5, Dik T. Winter wrote:
> In article <115c718c-fe66-4a34-ac7c-02b57c508d71@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> Musatov <marty.musatov@gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> When are you going to stop to post these mindless conjectures based on a
> very small number of cases?
Never but only by one stop.>
> > Consider each case:
> >
> > For four: (#4)
> >
> > 2*4+1=9 not prime
> > 2*14+1=29 prime
> > 2*24+1=49 not prime
> >
> > In the above instances "N" ends in "4" and is not prime, the formula
> > produces a number with square prime factors (i.e. 3*3=9 and 7*7=49).
> > (i.e. When it does not produce a prime the composite is a prime
> > squared).
>
> Wrong. 2*34+1 = 69 = 3*23.
> 2*544+1 = 1089 = 3*3*11*11
> 2*364+1 = 729 = 3*3*3*3*3*3
>
> > Also, we note:
> >
> > When "N" ends in "4" and the formula produces a composite number,
> > adding "two" to the composite produces a prime.
> >
> > Shown:
> > 2*4+1=9+2=11 prime
> > 2*24+1=49+2=51 prime
>
> Since when is 51 prime?
> --
> dik t. winter, cwi, science park 123, 1098 xg amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
> home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/
|
|
