In <J_OdnUu47ZSo2KfPnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@giganews.com>, on 09/18/2013 at 07:28 PM, fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> said:
>And, wouldn't the class abstract that leads >to Russell's paradox have been considered >a definition at one point in time?
Correct so far.
>How is it no longer a definition?
How is cheese no longer an omnivore? Nobody claimed that there wasn't a contradiction; they claimed that the contradiction did not arise from a definition. Russel's paradox is inherent in his axiom scheme,
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to firstname.lastname@example.org