Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Numbersystems, bijective, padic etc
Replies:
23
Last Post:
Oct 1, 2013 3:22 PM




baseone accounting for
Posted:
Oct 1, 2013 12:26 AM


you did not get the spirit of it; hashmarks is not the *canonical digital representation of baseone; it is canonical for romaN numeralS; you can easily prove it by induction on basenine (or, baseten, but that was a hint
> > > > > > 20 =132 9+9+2 202
padics are the n'est[lus ultra, but they have no archimedean valuation (absolute value; the archimedean integers are considered to be infinityadic



