The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: "Uncle Al" Schwartz caught on video: Blast from the past!
Replies: 9   Last Post: Oct 5, 2013 10:59 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Tom Potter

Posts: 497
Registered: 8/9/06
Re: "Uncle Al" Schwartz caught on video: Blast from the past!
Posted: Oct 4, 2013 5:52 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Lord Androcles" <71stPigeonHole6thFloor@Rochester.castle> wrote in message
> "Tom Potter" wrote in message news:l2hbdo$cpg$
> "Lord Androcles" <71stPigeonHole6thFloor@Rochester.castle> wrote in
> message
> news:opS2u.9534$eW3.4873@fx23.am4...

>> "Tom Potter" wrote in message news:riN2u.6885$Bi.3553@fx17.iad...
>> "Lord Androcles" <71stPigeonHole6thFloor@Rochester.castle> wrote in
>> message
>> news:2bp2u.7477$7g6.3016@fx28.am4...

>>> "I don't know" -- Michael Moroney wrote in message
>>> news:l1hisf$bm3$
>>> "I guess" -- Michael Moroney wrote in message
>>> news:l1hisf$bm3$
>>> gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
>>> for v = 0.9994c,
>>> gamma = 1/sqrt(1-0.9994^2)
>>> = 28.87184456102242327529861961622
>>> Clever Michael Moroney agrees!
>>> Speed of Astronaut in the frame of Sirius = distance /time
>>> = 8.6 ly / 8.605 years = 0.9994c
>>> Clever Michael Moroney agrees!
>>> Speed of Sirius in the frame of Astronaut =( 8.6 * gamma) / (
>>> 8.605/gamma)
>>> = 0.9994 * gamma^2
>>> = 834.7c
>>> "Nothing can exceed the speed of light"
>>> Stupid Mickey Moron doesn't like it. Stupid Mickey Moron wants his own
>>> relativity to replace Einstein's. Stupid Mickey Moron ran away.

>> gamma = 1/cosine(A) - 1
>> where cosine(A) is the cosine of the angle
>> whose sine is velocity(A)/C.
>> The velocity/C sine function is called beta
>> and also the fine structure constant.
>> Considering that the velocity
>> of electro-magnetic propagation in a medium
>> ==========================================
>> What medium is that, Potty? Ectoplasm, the ghost of aether?
>> -- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

> Electromagnetic waves convey action
> from a sources to sinks
> much like Newton's cradle.
> Maxwell modeled the transfer very well
> with his "displacement current".
> In order to explain how electromagnetic action propagated,
> Maxwell came up with the concept of "dielectric displacement"
> =====================================================
> Yes, we know, aether. Seven years after Maxwell's death Michelson
> made it redundant, rendering Maxwell's theory of permittivity of aether
> obsolete. When the substance vanishes its properties vanish too.
> Your Newton's cradle analogy is a good one; but for a magnetic field,
> not a displacement current. Had Maxwell lived he'd have modified his
> theory. When the first ball is raised it has potential energy and no
> motion, akin to a voltage. When released the PE falls to zero and
> the KE is at a maximum, akin to a magnetic field. Striking the next
> ball, the first ball stops dead and the KE is transferred to the next
> ball which rises. You've got displacement KE, but not displacement
> current. You can do the same with a chain of transformers, the
> secondary winding connected to the primary of the next transformer,
> but the links in the chain are alternating copper loop, iron loop,
> copper loop, iron loop... with an electric current in the copper and
> a magnetic flux in the iron. So I'll say again: What medium is that,
> Potty? Ectoplasm, the ghost of aether? Electromagnetic waves are
> the alternating fields that exist without the hardware of copper
> Corollary:
> The velocity of light is source dependent, not aether dependent
> or observer dependent. Newton's cradle (if you want the analogy)
> works just the same in the ISS travelling at 17,000 mph and so does
> MMX.
> Newton would agree, Galileo would agree, William of Ockham
> would agree. Throw that gamma shit out, it's for the birds.
> -- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

I am saddened to see that my pal Androcles
did not understand my post,

which clearly indicated that the AETHER
is the geometry used to map objects and events.

Gamma, like geometry, is a useful tool.

All of Maxwell's tools work very well,
and if he had stated that
"The map is not the territory."

people wouldn't be making such a fuss
over an AETHER and Relativity.

Tom Potter

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.