"Hetware" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:BredndIZwtfJys7PnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@megapath.net... > On 10/6/2013 11:51 PM, Arturo Magidin wrote: <snip>
> You are finally catching on to what I was saying.
Who's catching up?
> However, whether or not f(t) is defined at 3 >> is *precisely* the crux of the matter here. > > I defined it as continuous.
A function is proved continuous.
>> History teaches mathematicians what axioms and what definitions to >> use. Refusing to accept them because you want to reject history makes >> you a willful ignoramus, not the searcher for knowledge that you try >> to tell yourself you are being. > > You should study the discipline of axiomatics sometime.