Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: small confidence limit to demonstrate inability to reject H0?
Replies: 4   Last Post: Oct 13, 2013 4:09 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Richard Ulrich Posts: 2,961 Registered: 12/13/04
Re: small confidence limit to demonstrate inability to reject H0?
Posted: Oct 11, 2013 6:48 PM

On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 07:29:35 -0700 (PDT), paul.domaskis@gmail.com
wrote:

>On Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:08:03 PM UTC-4, Rich Ulrich wrote:
>
> <...some confirmations that small p-values do not demonstrate a
> lack difference, and that the use of large p-values may be due to
> historical lack of understanding, which may be improving...>
>

>> As a very general rule, p-levels are not good indicators of effect
>> size. Or, conversely, for lack-of-effect size. N is the huge
>> confounder, plus, it depends on how sensitive your test is for
>> finding an "effect."

>
>Understood. I'm just focusing on acceptance/rejection of H0.

>>
>> When you want to show similarity, you want to show a narrow CI on
>> some relevant difference, for some meaningful measure... not merely
>> an absence of "demonstrated" difference. Crappy measures can give
>> you apparent similarities.

>
>My understanding is that narrow CI can only show lack of evidence against H0, but can never show the evidence for H0.

As Herman says in a post that *seems* to reply to this
the same time), it is an easy conventional comment that
"The null hypothesis is never true."

A narrow CI on the size of a difference gives us evidence
that the difference is not larger. Or, not large enough
to matter.

And I don't worry about the Bayeisian approach.

--
Rich Ulrich

Date Subject Author
10/10/13 Paul
10/10/13 Richard Ulrich
10/11/13 Paul
10/11/13 Richard Ulrich
10/13/13 Luis A. Afonso