Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Product, Filters and Quantales
Replies: 31   Last Post: Oct 21, 2013 7:52 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Victor Porton

Posts: 524
Registered: 8/1/05
Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Posted: Oct 14, 2013 12:33 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

William Elliot wrote:

> On Sat, 12 Oct 2013, Victor Porton wrote:
>> >
>> >> The following is a counter-example for
>> >>
>> >> F o inf_k Gk = inf{ F o Gk | k in K }
>> >>
>> >> Let D = Ft { (-e;e) | e>0 }
>> >>
>> >> ("Ft" means the filter generated by the given base, right?)

>> > D is a filter for R on P(R) ?
>> Yes.
>
> D is the neighborhood filter for 0 in R.
>

>> >> F = D x up{0}
>> >>

>> > up {0} = { r in R | 0 <= r } is not a filter. Do you mean
>> > up {{0}} = { A in P(R) | {0} subset A }?

>
> So which is it for up 0? The first or the second?
> BTW, the first is a filter on (R,<=).


Clearly the second.

up {0}

is the principal filter on R generated by the set {0}/

>> G_e = up{0} x (e;+oo)
>>

>> >> Then /\G = up{0} x up(e;+oo)
>>
> Which is correct?
> up(e,oo) = { x in R | e < 0 } is a filter on (R,<=)
> or
> up(e,oo) = { A in P(R) | (e,oo) subset A } a filter for R on P(R)?


Second.

I don't mess with filters on (R,<=), these are essentially outside of my
research topic.

>> G = { G_e | e>0 }
>>

>> >> up{0} x (e;+oo) = up{0} x up{0}
>> >>
>> >> So F o inf_k Gk != inf{ F o Gk | k in K }




Date Subject Author
10/9/13
Read Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/10/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/11/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/11/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/12/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/12/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/12/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/14/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/15/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/15/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/16/13
Read Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/16/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/17/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/17/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/17/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/18/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/18/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/19/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
Victor Porton
10/19/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot
10/19/13
Read Mistake
William Elliot
10/20/13
Read Re: Mistake
fom
10/20/13
Read Re: Mistake
William Elliot
10/20/13
Read Re: Mistake
fom
10/20/13
Read Re: Mistake
William Elliot
10/20/13
Read Prime Interger Topology
William Elliot
10/20/13
Read Re: Prime Interger Topology
fom
10/20/13
Read Re: Prime Interger Topology
William Elliot
10/20/13
Read Re: Prime Interger Topology
fom
10/21/13
Read Re: Prime Interger Topology
fom
10/21/13
Read Re: Prime Interger Topology
William Elliot
10/21/13
Read Re: Prime Interger Topology
fom
10/20/13
Read Re: Product, Filters and Quantales
William Elliot

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.