The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.num-analysis

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The nature of gravity
Replies: 28   Last Post: Apr 11, 2014 4:14 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com

Posts: 67
Registered: 3/17/12
Re: The nature of gravity
Posted: Oct 14, 2013 5:04 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

What is beyond any doubt is that the product of the surface g of the proton at its Schwarzschild radius and the Compton wavelength of the particular mass given by the assemblage:

{(Mop)^2}/Mpl comes to Gc/qa.

Mop=proton opposite mass where Gm structure=29.6906036.

Mpl= Planck mass.

qa = quantum adjustor; 4/{4h(c/2)^4}^0.33333rec=3.62994678.

Mpr= mass of proton.

One of the several variations of parameters and constants that precede Gc/qa
is:

c^2 x Mpl/Mop=Gc/qa. See earlier posts.

This is the same as C^2 x Mpr/Mpl=Gc/qa.

This can be altered to: C^2 x Mpr = (Gc x Mpl)/qa = 1.50327857 x 10^-10 J the Compton energy of the proton, mc^2.

Therefore, {Gc x (Mpl)^2}{1.06297706)/(qa)=2x2.1798742x10^-18 J, the Rydberg energy.

Now where did 1.06297706 come from you might ask?

Well, you take the difference between the Rydberg & proton energies, 3.4480856x10^7 and divide it into c and you get 8.694461. You then take the
Gm product of the proton opposite, 29.6906036, and divide it by the qa, 3.62994678, and you are left with 8.17934956.

And 8.694461 divided by 8.17934956 is 1.06297706. There are other ways and it always comes out at just that, 1.06297706, the ultimate Rydberg number.


.



Date Subject Author
12/29/12
Read The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/3/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/4/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/22/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
2/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
2/23/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/16/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
4/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
4/25/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/4/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/6/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
6/1/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
8/13/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
8/24/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
9/9/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
9/19/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
henisdov@netvision.net.il
9/21/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
10/7/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/7/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/14/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/21/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
11/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
11/19/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
m.michael.musatov@gmail.com
4/11/14
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.