On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:06:55 AM UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > "fom" <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote in message > > news:maKdnVlG5s1MCcPPnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@giganews.com... > > > On 10/16/2013 1:03 AM, Albrecht wrote: > > <snipped> > > > That is a humorous statement. > > > > > So, are you defending constructivism? > > > > Is he? Which constructions has he ever provided? > > > > > The arguments generally appear that way. > > > > Ah, then I get it, just not an acquaintance of mine, one more. > > > > > You are correct concerning the necessity of infinity. > > > > But, is he? "Actual infinity" is logically necessary, Zeno docet. And > > quite reasonable too, just levels of abstraction. >
Oh, you are also live in the dream that Cantor has anything to do with Zeno's paradoxa? Okay. Give me an idea in which way "actual infinity" changes anything in that concern.