Nam Nguyen wrote: > On 19/10/2013 11:57 AM, Peter Percival wrote: >> Nam Nguyen wrote: >> >>> What would you find confusing on one of the invalidity forms (for meta >>> statements) I've just reminded Peter in my recent post to him? >> >> I've raised some questions about one. And there's another is there? (Or >> are others? Crumbs.) > > Nice try, Peter. But this is somewhat a dis-genuine response from you. > > Why don't you first comment about my definition of "impossible to know" > in this context? > > (It has to do with a collection of truths in meta level).
Done elsewhere. And why don't _you_ answer my points? One rule for Nam and another for his interlocutors (at least so Nam hopes).
[Btw, either non-genuine or disingenuous. I suspect you mean the latter. See what a generous fellow I am? I'm even helping you to make negative comments about me.]
-- The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here Lincoln at Gettysburg