Den måndagen den 21:e oktober 2013 kl. 14:47:52 UTC+2 skrev Bart Goddard: > Peter Percival <email@example.com> wrote in news:l43067$pgn$1 > > @news.albasani.net: > > > > > Dan's definition of ^ doesn't allow the value of 0^0 to be inferred. > > > That is a big hint that the definition is inadequate. > > > > Especially when the whole point was supposed to be > > about 0^0. His "new way" of looking at the issue seems > > to be "pretend 0 doesn't exist. Problem solved."