Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 18:24:56 UTC+1 skrev Bart Goddard: > Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in > > news:firstname.lastname@example.org: > > > > > On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 11:51:13 AM UTC-4, Bart Goddard wrote: > > > > > >> statements. You're proposing to extend exponentiation from > > >> > > >> N to N_0, but somehow exponentiation isn't extended to 0. > > >> > > > > > > On the contrary, I have defined exponentiation on all of N_0. > > > > No, you haven't. That's the problem. If you "define" > > exponentiation for 0 in such a way that you have to > > exclude 0 from all your formulae, then, in fact, you > > have not defined exponentiation on N_0. How can anyone be > > this stupid and still remember to breathe?
And again zero is not a number, and there certainly is no correct answer to question like 1/0, 0/1, square 0, sqrt 0. Because there is certainly no operation to perform no more than elephant squared + tiger.