On 30/10/2013 20:42, Bart Goddard wrote: > Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in > news:email@example.com: > > >> If, for some reason, you don't want to call it a definition, call it a >> theorem. > > No. It is neither. It's a bit of empty stupidity. > You're claiming to extend exponentiation to N_0, but > all of your rules say "nonzero base." It's a monument > of idiocy, the likes of which mankind has never before > seen.
Come on, Bart, you've been around sci.math for a while; however egregiously daft Dan's ideas on exponentiation might be, they are nowhere near breaking any records for idiocy even just in sci.math.