Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:firstname.lastname@example.org:
> On Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:01:05 AM UTC-4, Bart Goddard wrote: > >> >> mathematician knows exactly how to deal with 0^0. > > > There does not appear to be any consensus, however. You, yourself have > admitted finding 0^0 to be ambiguous -- either 0 or 1 -- but, so far, > all we have from you is a bit of hand-waving.
This is what you don't get, and you refuse to be taught: There IS consensus: We all know that in different situations, one handles 0^0 differently. You're "solution" is to do nothing.
>> You've done nothing. > > On the contrary, I have presented a rigorous, mathematical basis, > complete with formal proofs, for dealing with the ambiguity of 0^0
No, you've presented nothing that deals with 0^0. All of your statements are about nonzero bases, so 0^0 is not dealt with, it is simply ignored. I.e., you've done nothing.