Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.
|
|
Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.stat.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
A pertinent/impertinent question. . .
Replies:
8
Last Post:
Nov 13, 2013 4:02 PM
|
 |
|
Luis A. Afonso
Posts:
4,758
From:
LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered:
2/16/05
|
|
Re: A pertinent/impertinent question. . .
Posted:
Nov 3, 2013 2:04 PM
|
|
The *invisible* moderator did not care, or ignore, that the test applied to samples as short as 50 provides:
_______U______V_______q ______0.23____0.22_____(.4) ______0.37____0.34_____(.5) ______0.59____0.51_____(.6) ______0.89____0.84_____(.7) ______1.38____1.07_____(.8) ______2.32____1.63_____(.9)
___and fatally the contribution to a *significative* value issue from the JB test will be mostly from skewness-responsibility . . . My later post had worth 1% relevance: amazing isn´t it? This is the real world we must live in . . .? Luis A. Afonso
|
|
|
|