
Re: Partition of a filter
Posted:
Nov 8, 2013 2:24 PM


William Elliot wrote:
> Of course, most mathematicians would skip the section on partitions > for already knowing about them. That and other misunderstanding > will happen when you use established terms with your novel definitions. > > Are these correct? > > Definition 3.60. > A thorning of a point a in a complete lattice L > is a subset A, of L\bottom with sup S = a and > for all x,y in A, some d in L\bottom with d <= x,y
What is "L\bottom with sup S"?
> or do you simply mean A is down directed? > > Damn that weird, dysfunctional, squished inward equal sign, notation > > Definition 3.61. > A weak partition of an element a in a complete lattice L > is a subset A, of L\bottom with sup A = a and for all > x in A, there's some d in L\bottom with d <= a, sup A\x > > Definition 3.62. > Does A weird= B mean anthing?

